1 BTC to USD - Exchange - How much US Dollar (USD) is 1

Nutcoin

Nutcoin - The Anti Scarcity Stabilized Currency
[link]

Crowdsourcing, Become a beggar, Donate, HELP THE BITCOIN ECONOMY

As the title describes. I'm going to get alot of downvotes but if anyone receives even a few bitcents I guess it helped the bitcoin economy somehow Leave your crowdsource ideas, ask for a little mBTC, spread your generosity to help the bit-conomy thrive
[link]

Cryptocurrency Trading Game

The Crypto Trading Game is simulated cryptocurrency trading using real market prices. Each game has its own post in /CryptoTradingGame. The object of the game is to have the highest value portfolio before the game's end time. Everyone starts the game with $10,000 USD to trade as they wish.
[link]

Unable to keep elements preserved in a vector after a boolean "do while" loop

I'm going to give reddit a shot since I didn't receive any response from StackOverflow.
I am in a process of making a bitcoin managing program for an intro CS class and here are my objectives (only mentioned ones that I need in this context): I have managed to complete the following objectives. My program has 4 menu options stored in class menu. The user can choose from the following:
  1. Find current Bitcoin value in USD
  2. Buy/sell Bitcoin
  3. Print current balance
  4. Print history of transactions
Let's say the user selections option 2 and inputs how much user wants to sell or buy. The program will so far do the following:
Currently I am having trouble with the following step:
So far, I've tried creating a vector and I tried using push_back.() every time the function is called.
class ledger // the log of all transactions //1) It will store the transaction strings just so we have //a record of the buy sell commands //2) It will be able to print out the transaction history if requested { public: vector bitcoin; void bitcoinHistory(string bitcoinAmnt, string date) { string btc, time; btc = bitcoinAmnt; time = date; bitcoin.push_back(btc + "BTC on " + time); for (unsigned int x = 0; x < bitcoin.size(); x++) { cout << bitcoin[x] << endl; } repeat = true; \\ boolean returns the user back to main menu 
```
A sample result from cout << bitcoin[x] I am successfully able to get: 0.035349BTC on Wed Mar 25 01:44:02 2020
However, once the program is looped, the previous transactions don't seem to save and the element seems to be replaced with the newer transaction data. Despite multiple transactions, the bitcoin.size() seems to be resetting, and I only see an output of a single transaction history only. I am not able to figure out why. If you'd like to see more part of the code, please let me know. Thank you.
submitted by I_need_2_learn_math to cpp_questions [link] [comments]

General question: At what point does comparing Bitcoin price to fiat (USD) value become meaningless? If Bitcoin reaches 1 million, or more, doesn’t that means the trust in fiat has fallen considerably?

submitted by Mendrinkbeer to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Some developer-related thoughts... 1) Every time BABcoin loses value, USD raised to pay devs in the BABcoin socialist scheme drops and becomes even less appealing. 2) Dev who won 200 BitCoin© at the CG conference be lovin' it as BitCoin© price rises.

submitted by jim-btc to bitcoincashSV [link] [comments]

Million dollar projections are meaningless

There are so many predictions being thrown around these days suggesting bitcoin will hit a million dollars by a certain date. I think it's important to change this mindset.
First of all, mainstream adoption is only a small part of what will drive the price of bitcoin up. More importantly, bitcoin will act as a hedge against failing fiat currencies. If we hit these million dollar price predictions any time soon, it will be caused mostly by hyperinflation of the USD, and the price of a bitcoin (valued in USD) will be completely irrelevant.
In short, million dollar bitcoin means the dollar has collapsed, and bitcoin will be measured in something more relevant.
submitted by Taishan555 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin's USD value is falling but Gridcoin's USD value is rising. Why?

Since GRC isn't accepted on any of the fiat exchanges, the only way to get fiat out of it is to trade it for Bitcoin and then sell the Bitcoin. But Bitcoin has lost something like 25% of its value in the last two weeks, while over the same period this is the first time that GRC has steadily maintained a value over 10 cents.
That would suggest to me that the GRC value in Bitcoins has risen much more quickly than the Bitcoin value in USD has fallen. I'm curious as to why that might be happening.
submitted by jack_but_with_reddit to gridcoin [link] [comments]

bitcoin is not a bubble it exactly the opposite supercollapse of matter in a good sense like black hole again in a good sense it will suck up all fiat money and gain value to the equilibrium 10 mln usd per 1 btc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pta-gf6JaHQ
submitted by sakhastan to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

The three biggest Bitcoin wallets contain over 99974 Bitcoins, even at today’s low Bitcoin price of $6772 the three wallets are worth between $677 billion and $1.26 billion USD each. In comparison, the world’s richest individual, Jeff Bezos, is currently valued at $112 billion USD.

The three biggest Bitcoin wallets contain over 99974 Bitcoins, even at today’s low Bitcoin price of $6772 the three wallets are worth between $677 billion and $1.26 billion USD each. In comparison, the world’s richest individual, Jeff Bezos, is currently valued at $112 billion USD. submitted by cindex_platform to u/cindex_platform [link] [comments]

[H] $20 USD Google play gift card in $1, $2 and $5 value expire March 31 [W] 80% paypal or 75% bitcoin

values are
2 x $5 google play
3 x $2 google play
4 x $1 google play
Please comment and pm to inquire.
submitted by terwg to giftcardexchange [link] [comments]

150 USD value in XRP (Ripple) and BTC (Bitcoin) - 3 Winners (1/28) {WW}

150 USD value in XRP (Ripple) and BTC (Bitcoin) - 3 Winners (1/28) {WW} submitted by Simptonym to giveaways [link] [comments]

bitcoin is not a bubble it exactly the opposite supercollapse of matter in a good sense like black hole again in a good sense it will suck up all fiat money and gain value to the equilibrium 10 mln usd per 1 btc /r/Bitcoin

bitcoin is not a bubble it exactly the opposite supercollapse of matter in a good sense like black hole again in a good sense it will suck up all fiat money and gain value to the equilibrium 10 mln usd per 1 btc /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

"51%" Attack

TL;DR: With only 30% of network power a Majority Attack is possible and profitable. Am I missing anything?
Generally speaking, blockchains based on Proof-of-Work authentications are using amount of work as the weight of one's vote.
I will be talking specifically about bitcoin to simplify the discussion.
A transaction is consider confirmed usually after 6 blocks have been mined above it. Mostly even 2 blocks are considered enough, but let's examine the secure decision of 6 block. Now assume I have 30% of the network power.
Me and the network have the same prefix of blockchain. At this point I'm beging to work and append to it my own blocks, ignoring the rest of the network. The chances I will manage to build a blockchain that is at least as long as longest chain in the network, by the time the transaction is "confirmed" - is roughly 15% (reference below).
That means I can revert my confirmed transactions 15% of the times. Now all I need is to earn more money on a reverted block than I'm paying for the total computing power. This is not impossible. If a "confirmed" block is even half-fulled with my transactions, the total amount of transferred money can easily be 2 million usd (reference below).
Reverting at 15% success rate means at least one block every two hours (one block every ten minutes).
But 2 hours of work only cost me about 140,000 usd (ref below).
But more importantly: playing fair doesn't seem necessarily more profitable.
Playing by the rules for two hours equals today about 1.2 million usd income (If you own 30% of the network power).
It seems profitable to attack the system every now and then, even with 30% of network power.
(Obviously I rather revert a lot of "small" transactions than a huge one, so no one will get susplicious and wait for more confirmations.)
What am I missing?
A few points: - I rather not address issues such as "an attacker can be easily found". This may, or may not, be true. But it's not relevant for the question: Is it possible and profitable to attack the network with 30% network power. - If you are stating I'm not mistaken and this is true (which I doubt), please do specify your amount of familirity with the protocol and the security of the system.
Refernces:
Success rate with 30% network power (math here is simple but clumbsy to write down rigorously) https://pastebin.com/RhnGi04W
A single block carry a few thousand bitcoins (namely, a few million usd) https://blockchain.info/
Bitcoin value in usd https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin
Profits and costs of the entire bitcoin network: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
(I assumed one hour of my working profits roughly: total_bitcoin_mining_income/365/24*0.3 as I own 0.3 of the network power)
submitted by buffacho to btc [link] [comments]

Why do the BTC, ETH, LTC charts on GDAX follow each other so similarly, despite all 3 having USD pairing?

I understand that on coinmarketcap, for example, ethereum's price in dollars will drop if bitcoins value in usd drops, since we measure ethereum's value in bitcoin. But on GDAX, or Coinbase, all 3 BTC ETH LTC are paired to the USD, which cuts off these ties mentioned above through bitcoin.
I've noticed that the charts on BTC ETH LTC on GDAX follow each other really really closely. If BTC goes up, then ETH and LTC goes up. The delay is at most 5 seconds.
So why is this? Is there some algorithmic explanation, bot trading?
submitted by oloftw to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

1 year 7 months ago one bitcoin was valued around $400 USD. In just 1 year the value of bitcoin has increased 500%. In 6 months it's increased 200%. I haven't been around long enough but these numbers seems absolutely unreal. /r/Bitcoin

1 year 7 months ago one bitcoin was valued around $400 USD. In just 1 year the value of bitcoin has increased 500%. In 6 months it's increased 200%. I haven't been around long enough but these numbers seems absolutely unreal. /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Rough estimate: If Dogecoin were to this moment be as valuable as Bitcoin, 1 DOG = 0.00021 BTC ≈ 0.15 USD with a 33332% increase in value.

My math might be flawed so help me out here, but I've calculated that if Dogecoin were to instantly be as valuable as Bitcoin at the time of this post it would have a 1 USD to 7 Dogecoin exchange rate.
The math here is very simple. I took the max potential Dogecoins and divided those by the max potential Bitcoins. I then took that number and divided it by the current value of 1 BTC to USD.
100,000,000,000 / 21,000,000 ≈ 4761.9
4761.9 / 680 ≈ 7
These same numbers will also show us that we will probably never see Dogecoin trading for more than 1 Doge to .00021 BTC on the exchanges.
21,000,000 / 100,000,000,000 = 0.00021
Lastly, we can also calculate how much growth Dogecoin will see if it were to grow to the same value as Bitcoin using today's Dogecoin to Bitcoin exchange rate and the 0.00021 exchange rate from above which show a 33332% increase in value.
0.00021 / .00000063 ≈ 333.32 x 100 = 33332%
Please take note that these estimates are very simple and ignoring many other variables, but I just thought I'd share these calculations with everyone.
submitted by pelvicpenguin to dogecoin [link] [comments]

"Mr. Bitcoin! Have you changed?" What is the core value of bitcoin in the future? 【Huobi-USD BitYes rewards 0.1 BTC for the best answer】

Hello everyone, I am "Hobbit" from BitYes, Huobi's BTC-USD exchange. On 4/7, 4/14, 4/22, 4/28 , BitYes will raise a bitcoin related fun topic and award 0.1BTC for the best answer (or answers) we pick! Please speak out your fun or useful ideas.
Today's topic is "Mr. Bitcoin! Have you changed?" We still remember that on November 19, 2013 was the all-time high price of bitcoin on Huobi – 8,000 CNY, which is more than 1,200 USD. That was almost ten times higher than the price when Huobi opened. Today, the bitcoin price has declined to less than 240 USD and we still don't know if the price will reverse soon or not. But it is a good time to think about the true value of bitcoin. When the price reached 1,200 USD, the speculation value was more than the technology value. Now, the practical application of bitcoin has got more attention. So what is the core value of bitcoin in the future? Let's know your fun and valuable ideas! We will pick the best answer (or answers) by 13th of April.
【Bityes is giving away 0.03 BTC for registering. Invite friends, get 0.03BTC as well】 Learn more : https://www.bityes.com/topic/btc_awards_register_invite?utm_source=Reddit&utm_medium=Forum&utm_term=FunTopic&utm_content=MrBitcoinChanged&utm_campaign=0.03BTCGiv
submitted by Huobi-USD to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

POW system "51%" attack

TL;DR: With only 30% of network power a Majority Attack is possible and profitable. Am I missing anything?
Generally speaking, blockchains based on Proof-of-Work authentications are using amount of work as the weight of one's vote.
I will be talking specifically about bitcoin to simplify the discussion.
A transaction is consider confirmed usually after 6 blocks have been mined above it. Mostly even 2 blocks are considered enough, but let's examine the secure decision of 6 block. Now assume I have 30% of the network power.
Me and the network have the same prefix of blockchain. At this point I'm beging to work and append to it my own blocks, ignoring the rest of the network. The chances I will manage to build a blockchain that is at least as long as longest chain in the network, by the time the transaction is "confirmed" - is roughly 15% (reference below).
That means I can revert my confirmed transactions 15% of the times. Now all I need is to earn more money on a reverted block than I'm paying for the total computing power. This is not impossible. If a "confirmed" block is even half-fulled with my transactions, the total amount of money can easily be 2 million usd (reference below).
Reverting at 15% success rate means at least one block every two hours (one block every ten minutes).
But 2 hours of work only cost me about 140,000 usd.
Or more importantly: playing fair doesn't seem necessarily more profitable. Playing by the rules for two hours equals today about 1.2 million usd income (If you own 30% of the network power).
It seems profitable to attack the system every now and then, even with 30% of network power.
(Obviously I rather revert a lot of "small" transactions than a huge one, so no one will get susplicious and wait for more confirmations.)
What am I missing?
A few points: - I rather not address issues such as "an attacker can be easily found". This may, or may not, be true. But it's not relevant for the question: Is it possible and profitable to attack the network with 30% network power. - If you are stating I'm not mistaken and this is true (which I doubt), please do specify your amount of familirity with the protocol and the security of the system.
Refernces:
Success rate with 30% network power (math here is simple but clumbsy to write down rigorously) https://pastebin.com/RhnGi04W
A single block carry a few thousand bitcoins (namely, a few million usd) https://blockchain.info/
Bitcoin value in usd https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin
Profits and costs of the entire bitcoin network: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
(I assumed one hour of my working profits roughly: total_bitcoin_mining_income/365/24*0.3 as I own 0.3 of the network power)
submitted by buffacho to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Is the capital gains tax propping up BTC/USD?

The ETF being rejected, in general, was bad for bitcoin's value in USD in the short term.
The threats of fork-ish things on both sides of BU/Core, in general, is a negative sign for BTC/USD as well.
(I know there are people rooting for both of these things, but Im speaking in my subjective interpretation of generalities)
The point is that I think most people would think bitcoin's value to be going down with respect to the US Dollar.
But it isn't (yet).
However it is going down with respect to almost all altcoins.
Value, I think, then is leaving bitcoin into alts, but not into USD. Could capital gains tax be the reason? Are people avoiding (technically evading here, I suppose) tax on profits by jumping to an alt instead of USD?
submitted by chiefy81 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

"Mr. Bitcoin! Have you changed?" What is the core value of bitcoin in the future? 【Huobi-USD BitYes rewards 0.1 BTC for the best answer】

Hello everyone, I am "Hobbit" from BitYes, Huobi's BTC-USD exchange. On 4/7, 4/14, 4/22, 4/28 , BitYes will raise a bitcoin related fun topic and award 0.1BTC for the best answer (or answers) we pick! Please speak out your fun or useful ideas.
Please leave your comment in the post below to win the 0.1BTC reward! http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/33glni/mr_bitcoin_have_you_changed_what_is_the_core/
submitted by Huobi-USD to FreeBits [link] [comments]

Best API for getting crypto value in USD?

Hey, I've been looking for an API to get Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Bitcoin's value in USD to display on my site. I'm trying to use cryptsy, but it's always timing out, and it looks like I'm getting a lot of data I really don't need. I thought I'd ask some people here on reddit for the best way to do what I need to do. Thanks!
submitted by gkamer8 to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Weve been brainwashed for 70 years to be "American" now we face the end and it seems like the good majority is only rubbing the sleep from their eyes. The current state of the world is horrible, I don't see this just "passing" over.

Our families and friends have been being brainwashed in America for almost 70 years now. This collapse of this country has been happening for generations. It started with the police force in the sixties, and then the dumbing down of our education, demoralizing our views with the ads on TV to be consumed by sex, drugs, and consumerism. Our Healthcare system is flawed, and our justice system is absolutely flawed. The banks are literally playing The game of monopoly with the government, they can't seem to print money fast enough to buy out corporations. They must make the stock market pretty to obtain the machismo stigma of "great america". The dollar bill is also nearly as useless as the amount of inflation occurring, yet we steadily keep pushing these paper ious around. Wait until staple items like bread and milk are nearly impossible to affordin five years if we are lucky.
If you believe this is fake news, then America has successfully brainwashed you into to believing that way of living is correct. America is one of the planets biggest enemies (in my eyes) and I pray that our civilization wakes up soon. To be honest it appears we are far too late. I believe that if the worst case scenario happens, (and at these times it seems there are several realistic downfalls) then almost all Americans will be in shock coming to the realization to late that they too have been a pawn and a slave in a broken system for too long.
Statistically, Americans are the least happiest they have ever been in this country. The world is watching our government scam and create fraud. The world is feeling the impact of the inflation of the dollar as their own economic systems cannot handle the current level of inflation. Currently, there is so much USD floating around outside of America that it is even beyond belief it still holds any value at all. We are talking since 1971, when Nixon ended the Bretton Woods agreement to take the USD off of the gold standard which helped the FEDs and banks play monopoly and flood the world. They've backed this fraud with immense amounts of military technology and power to imply the thuggish effect of American government. America is home of a scamming government that loves flaunting its big guns and ego to the world. They do this to hold the value of their monopoly.
As the world opens their eyes to the bullshit of America, the USD will undoubtedly collapse. Items such as bitcoin, precious metals, and bartering will become of greater value than the USD. This has got to stop, we the people need to become more aware. It is disgusting the amount of ignorance in this country. 99% have been lied to by the 1% of the wealthy and that is our real enemy here.
If we remove the blinders from our eyes, and the bananas from our ears it would become easier to be present in the life around you, because life exists outside of America, and it is greater than America. We are not grandiose, we are not better than or more entitled to anything more than any other living life. I am not proud to be an American today because the government has made it an ignorant country to be easily manipulated for them to destroy the world. We will always be chasing the lifestyle they live because it has been advertised to us as a kid, and the game is rigged in their favor. The government wants you here to collect your tax and use you for your slave labor. If you don't work you lose life, but if you work 60+ hours a week in a sweatshop or crammed in an office cubicle trying to struggle to survive, my question is, is your life of value at this point?
We will always be the hamster on a wheel as society if we don't stand up and revolt. Our voice is heavier than any constitutional "right" weve been granted. Im not trying to promote anything more than awareness to fellow peers who feel closely to me with the current state of the world. It is our duty to perform civic duties, and if that includes providing information to those suffering from the propaganda, than we should.
There is also the possibility that I am 100% paranoid and a controversial minded person, but truthfully the proof is in the pudding and I really feel several of us are starting to realize...we need to do more for each other. The government is on their own team, we need to be on our team. If the country is divided then we should form our loyalties with whom we love and trust. This life is yours, dont let it go because you were lied to and misinformed. Make your life better, it just takes a little effort and will power. The great American govt cannot take away our soul, or our will, but they can and will keep encouraging us to live lives with little moral value, little real world educational knowledge, and instead continue to be encouraged in consumerism and sheep like living.
submitted by treemull93 to collapse [link] [comments]

What will undoubtedly happen from a macroeconomic (big picture) perspective... idiots

OKAY. So demand has been reduced dramatically around the world, our $21 trillion GDP has basically been paused for 2 months, so to keep it afloat (rough math), the government had to add $3.5 trillion to keep the economy running somewhat smoothly. That's a lot of printing, you idiots probably expect inflation. Wrong, step away from the US and look at what other countries are doing, the ECB (European Central Bank) and BOJ (Bank of Japan) are having to print trillions of dollars worth of EURO and YEN to keep their economies going, along with every other country getting pounded. Not only that, but since the US dollar makes up 70% of global transactions, in liquidity terms, trillions worth of euro and yen is MUCH MUCH more than any amount Jpow feels like printing, there's no way our printing could offset what the rest of the world is doing, so inflation isn't coming. If you want proof, just look at the euro/usd (going lower) and literally ANY emerging market currency is getting absolutely clapped vs the dollar.

Furthermore, not only is US corporate debt at an all time high, but emerging markets, the eurozone, and asia has borrowed more dollars than ever before at any point in history, basically everyone around the world's debt is denominated in US DOLLARS. So what's about to happen? It's already happening, demand for US dollars is going up because everyone around the world wants to borrow more to offset cash flow concerns and pay off existing debts, which will cause the dollar to increase in value. What happens when the whole world has debt in dollars and the dollar goes up in value? DEBT BECOMES MORE EXPENSIVE. This is DEFLATION, and in particular and even more terrifying DEBT DEFLATION, a phrase that would make Jpow absolutely shit himself (and he knows its coming). This has already started before the whole beervirus nonsense, look at Venezuela and Zimbabwe, they had too much dollar debt, no one wanted to lend to them anymore and whoops, their currency is worthless now. It's going to be like a game of musical chairs for people trying to get access to dollars, starting with emerging markets and eventually moving into the more developed economies. The result: massive corporate bankruptcies, countries defaulting on debt (devaluing their currencies) and eventually a deleveraging of massive proportions. This WILL occur and no amount of printing can stop it, it's already too far gone.

It doesn't matter what the stock market does, other markets around the world will be fucked, honestly it might cause the market to go up because of all the money fleeing other countries trying to find a safe place to live. Here are the plays assholes. TLT will go up because no matter what Jpow says, he doesn't control the fed funds rate, the market does, and US treasury bond yields have already priced in bonds going negative. CPI shows that we may see up to -3% inflation (3% deflation), meaning at .25% fed funds rate, the REAL rate is 3.25%, that is the worst thing possible during a deleveraging because it makes it harder to stimulate the economy, the fed has no choice, rates MUST go lower. Rates go lower, bond prices go up, TLT 12/18 $205c. Remember how I said scared foreign money will want to find a nice safe place to go when we go into the biggest debt crisis the world has seen in over 300 years? GLD 12/18 $240c. Finally, the dollar will rise in value as well so UUP 12/18 $28c.

As far the actual market, we hit a high of SPY 339.08 in February, fell to a low of 218.26 by mid March, and have since then retraced EXACTLY to the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level at 290, and started to bounce lower from there. I'm no technical analyst, but I do know history. During the greatest crashes in stock market history, 1929, 2001, 2008, the Nikkei in 1989 (Japan) this exact same thing happened, market got scared and fell to lows, then smoked that good hopium for a few weeks or month to retrace between 50% and 61.8% back to previews highs, then absolutely fell off a cliff. If you don't believe me, go look at the charts. Now, I'm personally not going to be betting on the US market falling because of the fact that its just straight up not reflecting reality and there are much better ways to trade on what's occurring (see trades above), but I PROMISE, that we will not be seeing new highs at any point any time soon.

TLDR; The world is going to shit due to the dollars over-dominance of the world market, we will soon see the worst deleveraging in human history, and may very well have to come up with a new fiat money system (probably not bitcoin, but it wouldn't hurt to have some). TLT 12/18 $205c, GLD 12/18 $240c, and UUP 12/18 $28c. If you wanna be an autist and buy weeklys, I can't help you, but I basically just gave you the next big short, so you're welcome.

DISCLAIMER: I didn't say what price to buy at for a reason, timing is extremely important for trades like this, so don't FOMO in and overpay, you will get clapped.
submitted by Rezuwrecked_ to wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

Why i’m bullish on Zilliqa (long read)

Edit: TL;DR added in the comments
 
Hey all, I've been researching coins since 2017 and have gone through 100s of them in the last 3 years. I got introduced to blockchain via Bitcoin of course, analyzed Ethereum thereafter and from that moment I have a keen interest in smart contact platforms. I’m passionate about Ethereum but I find Zilliqa to have a better risk-reward ratio. Especially because Zilliqa has found an elegant balance between being secure, decentralized and scalable in my opinion.
 
Below I post my analysis of why from all the coins I went through I’m most bullish on Zilliqa (yes I went through Tezos, EOS, NEO, VeChain, Harmony, Algorand, Cardano etc.). Note that this is not investment advice and although it's a thorough analysis there is obviously some bias involved. Looking forward to what you all think!
 
Fun fact: the name Zilliqa is a play on ‘silica’ silicon dioxide which means “Silicon for the high-throughput consensus computer.”
 
This post is divided into (i) Technology, (ii) Business & Partnerships, and (iii) Marketing & Community. I’ve tried to make the technology part readable for a broad audience. If you’ve ever tried understanding the inner workings of Bitcoin and Ethereum you should be able to grasp most parts. Otherwise, just skim through and once you are zoning out head to the next part.
 
Technology and some more:
 
Introduction
 
The technology is one of the main reasons why I’m so bullish on Zilliqa. First thing you see on their website is: “Zilliqa is a high-performance, high-security blockchain platform for enterprises and next-generation applications.” These are some bold statements.
 
Before we deep dive into the technology let’s take a step back in time first as they have quite the history. The initial research paper from which Zilliqa originated dates back to August 2016: Elastico: A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open Blockchains where Loi Luu (Kyber Network) is one of the co-authors. Other ideas that led to the development of what Zilliqa has become today are: Bitcoin-NG, collective signing CoSi, ByzCoin and Omniledger.
 
The technical white paper was made public in August 2017 and since then they have achieved everything stated in the white paper and also created their own open source intermediate level smart contract language called Scilla (functional programming language similar to OCaml) too.
 
Mainnet is live since the end of January 2019 with daily transaction rates growing continuously. About a week ago mainnet reached 5 million transactions, 500.000+ addresses in total along with 2400 nodes keeping the network decentralized and secure. Circulating supply is nearing 11 billion and currently only mining rewards are left. The maximum supply is 21 billion with annual inflation being 7.13% currently and will only decrease with time.
 
Zilliqa realized early on that the usage of public cryptocurrencies and smart contracts were increasing but decentralized, secure, and scalable alternatives were lacking in the crypto space. They proposed to apply sharding onto a public smart contract blockchain where the transaction rate increases almost linear with the increase in the amount of nodes. More nodes = higher transaction throughput and increased decentralization. Sharding comes in many forms and Zilliqa uses network-, transaction- and computational sharding. Network sharding opens up the possibility of using transaction- and computational sharding on top. Zilliqa does not use state sharding for now. We’ll come back to this later.
 
Before we continue dissecting how Zilliqa achieves such from a technological standpoint it’s good to keep in mind that a blockchain being decentralised and secure and scalable is still one of the main hurdles in allowing widespread usage of decentralised networks. In my opinion this needs to be solved first before blockchains can get to the point where they can create and add large scale value. So I invite you to read the next section to grasp the underlying fundamentals. Because after all these premises need to be true otherwise there isn’t a fundamental case to be bullish on Zilliqa, right?
 
Down the rabbit hole
 
How have they achieved this? Let’s define the basics first: key players on Zilliqa are the users and the miners. A user is anybody who uses the blockchain to transfer funds or run smart contracts. Miners are the (shard) nodes in the network who run the consensus protocol and get rewarded for their service in Zillings (ZIL). The mining network is divided into several smaller networks called shards, which is also referred to as ‘network sharding’. Miners subsequently are randomly assigned to a shard by another set of miners called DS (Directory Service) nodes. The regular shards process transactions and the outputs of these shards are eventually combined by the DS shard as they reach consensus on the final state. More on how these DS shards reach consensus (via pBFT) will be explained later on.
 
The Zilliqa network produces two types of blocks: DS blocks and Tx blocks. One DS Block consists of 100 Tx Blocks. And as previously mentioned there are two types of nodes concerned with reaching consensus: shard nodes and DS nodes. Becoming a shard node or DS node is being defined by the result of a PoW cycle (Ethash) at the beginning of the DS Block. All candidate mining nodes compete with each other and run the PoW (Proof-of-Work) cycle for 60 seconds and the submissions achieving the highest difficulty will be allowed on the network. And to put it in perspective: the average difficulty for one DS node is ~ 2 Th/s equaling 2.000.000 Mh/s or 55 thousand+ GeForce GTX 1070 / 8 GB GPUs at 35.4 Mh/s. Each DS Block 10 new DS nodes are allowed. And a shard node needs to provide around 8.53 GH/s currently (around 240 GTX 1070s). Dual mining ETH/ETC and ZIL is possible and can be done via mining software such as Phoenix and Claymore. There are pools and if you have large amounts of hashing power (Ethash) available you could mine solo.
 
The PoW cycle of 60 seconds is a peak performance and acts as an entry ticket to the network. The entry ticket is called a sybil resistance mechanism and makes it incredibly hard for adversaries to spawn lots of identities and manipulate the network with these identities. And after every 100 Tx Blocks which corresponds to roughly 1,5 hour this PoW process repeats. In between these 1,5 hour, no PoW needs to be done meaning Zilliqa’s energy consumption to keep the network secure is low. For more detailed information on how mining works click here.
Okay, hats off to you. You have made it this far. Before we go any deeper down the rabbit hole we first must understand why Zilliqa goes through all of the above technicalities and understand a bit more what a blockchain on a more fundamental level is. Because the core of Zilliqa’s consensus protocol relies on the usage of pBFT (practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance) we need to know more about state machines and their function. Navigate to Viewblock, a Zilliqa block explorer, and just come back to this article. We will use this site to navigate through a few concepts.
 
We have established that Zilliqa is a public and distributed blockchain. Meaning that everyone with an internet connection can send ZILs, trigger smart contracts, etc. and there is no central authority who fully controls the network. Zilliqa and other public and distributed blockchains (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) can also be defined as state machines.
 
Taking the liberty of paraphrasing examples and definitions given by Samuel Brooks’ medium article, he describes the definition of a blockchain (like Zilliqa) as: “A peer-to-peer, append-only datastore that uses consensus to synchronize cryptographically-secure data”.
 
Next, he states that: "blockchains are fundamentally systems for managing valid state transitions”. For some more context, I recommend reading the whole medium article to get a better grasp of the definitions and understanding of state machines. Nevertheless, let’s try to simplify and compile it into a single paragraph. Take traffic lights as an example: all its states (red, amber, and green) are predefined, all possible outcomes are known and it doesn’t matter if you encounter the traffic light today or tomorrow. It will still behave the same. Managing the states of a traffic light can be done by triggering a sensor on the road or pushing a button resulting in one traffic lights’ state going from green to red (via amber) and another light from red to green.
 
With public blockchains like Zilliqa, this isn’t so straightforward and simple. It started with block #1 almost 1,5 years ago and every 45 seconds or so a new block linked to the previous block is being added. Resulting in a chain of blocks with transactions in it that everyone can verify from block #1 to the current #647.000+ block. The state is ever changing and the states it can find itself in are infinite. And while the traffic light might work together in tandem with various other traffic lights, it’s rather insignificant comparing it to a public blockchain. Because Zilliqa consists of 2400 nodes who need to work together to achieve consensus on what the latest valid state is while some of these nodes may have latency or broadcast issues, drop offline or are deliberately trying to attack the network, etc.
 
Now go back to the Viewblock page take a look at the amount of transaction, addresses, block and DS height and then hit refresh. Obviously as expected you see new incremented values on one or all parameters. And how did the Zilliqa blockchain manage to transition from a previous valid state to the latest valid state? By using pBFT to reach consensus on the latest valid state.
 
After having obtained the entry ticket, miners execute pBFT to reach consensus on the ever-changing state of the blockchain. pBFT requires a series of network communication between nodes, and as such there is no GPU involved (but CPU). Resulting in the total energy consumed to keep the blockchain secure, decentralized and scalable being low.
 
pBFT stands for practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance and is an optimization on the Byzantine Fault Tolerant algorithm. To quote Blockonomi: “In the context of distributed systems, Byzantine Fault Tolerance is the ability of a distributed computer network to function as desired and correctly reach a sufficient consensus despite malicious components (nodes) of the system failing or propagating incorrect information to other peers.” Zilliqa is such a distributed computer network and depends on the honesty of the nodes (shard and DS) to reach consensus and to continuously update the state with the latest block. If pBFT is a new term for you I can highly recommend the Blockonomi article.
 
The idea of pBFT was introduced in 1999 - one of the authors even won a Turing award for it - and it is well researched and applied in various blockchains and distributed systems nowadays. If you want more advanced information than the Blockonomi link provides click here. And if you’re in between Blockonomi and the University of Singapore read the Zilliqa Design Story Part 2 dating from October 2017.
Quoting from the Zilliqa tech whitepaper: “pBFT relies upon a correct leader (which is randomly selected) to begin each phase and proceed when the sufficient majority exists. In case the leader is byzantine it can stall the entire consensus protocol. To address this challenge, pBFT offers a view change protocol to replace the byzantine leader with another one.”
 
pBFT can tolerate ⅓ of the nodes being dishonest (offline counts as Byzantine = dishonest) and the consensus protocol will function without stalling or hiccups. Once there are more than ⅓ of dishonest nodes but no more than ⅔ the network will be stalled and a view change will be triggered to elect a new DS leader. Only when more than ⅔ of the nodes are dishonest (66%) double-spend attacks become possible.
 
If the network stalls no transactions can be processed and one has to wait until a new honest leader has been elected. When the mainnet was just launched and in its early phases, view changes happened regularly. As of today the last stalling of the network - and view change being triggered - was at the end of October 2019.
 
Another benefit of using pBFT for consensus besides low energy is the immediate finality it provides. Once your transaction is included in a block and the block is added to the chain it’s done. Lastly, take a look at this article where three types of finality are being defined: probabilistic, absolute and economic finality. Zilliqa falls under the absolute finality (just like Tendermint for example). Although lengthy already we skipped through some of the inner workings from Zilliqa’s consensus: read the Zilliqa Design Story Part 3 and you will be close to having a complete picture on it. Enough about PoW, sybil resistance mechanism, pBFT, etc. Another thing we haven’t looked at yet is the amount of decentralization.
 
Decentralisation
 
Currently, there are four shards, each one of them consisting of 600 nodes. 1 shard with 600 so-called DS nodes (Directory Service - they need to achieve a higher difficulty than shard nodes) and 1800 shard nodes of which 250 are shard guards (centralized nodes controlled by the team). The amount of shard guards has been steadily declining from 1200 in January 2019 to 250 as of May 2020. On the Viewblock statistics, you can see that many of the nodes are being located in the US but those are only the (CPU parts of the) shard nodes who perform pBFT. There is no data from where the PoW sources are coming. And when the Zilliqa blockchain starts reaching its transaction capacity limit, a network upgrade needs to be executed to lift the current cap of maximum 2400 nodes to allow more nodes and formation of more shards which will allow to network to keep on scaling according to demand.
Besides shard nodes there are also seed nodes. The main role of seed nodes is to serve as direct access points (for end-users and clients) to the core Zilliqa network that validates transactions. Seed nodes consolidate transaction requests and forward these to the lookup nodes (another type of nodes) for distribution to the shards in the network. Seed nodes also maintain the entire transaction history and the global state of the blockchain which is needed to provide services such as block explorers. Seed nodes in the Zilliqa network are comparable to Infura on Ethereum.
 
The seed nodes were first only operated by Zilliqa themselves, exchanges and Viewblock. Operators of seed nodes like exchanges had no incentive to open them for the greater public. They were centralised at first. Decentralisation at the seed nodes level has been steadily rolled out since March 2020 ( Zilliqa Improvement Proposal 3 ). Currently the amount of seed nodes is being increased, they are public-facing and at the same time PoS is applied to incentivize seed node operators and make it possible for ZIL holders to stake and earn passive yields. Important distinction: seed nodes are not involved with consensus! That is still PoW as entry ticket and pBFT for the actual consensus.
 
5% of the block rewards are being assigned to seed nodes (from the beginning in 2019) and those are being used to pay out ZIL stakers. The 5% block rewards with an annual yield of 10.03% translate to roughly 610 MM ZILs in total that can be staked. Exchanges use the custodial variant of staking and wallets like Moonlet will use the non-custodial version (starting in Q3 2020). Staking is being done by sending ZILs to a smart contract created by Zilliqa and audited by Quantstamp.
 
With a high amount of DS; shard nodes and seed nodes becoming more decentralized too, Zilliqa qualifies for the label of decentralized in my opinion.
 
Smart contracts
 
Let me start by saying I’m not a developer and my programming skills are quite limited. So I‘m taking the ELI5 route (maybe 12) but if you are familiar with Javascript, Solidity or specifically OCaml please head straight to Scilla - read the docs to get a good initial grasp of how Zilliqa’s smart contract language Scilla works and if you ask yourself “why another programming language?” check this article. And if you want to play around with some sample contracts in an IDE click here. The faucet can be found here. And more information on architecture, dapp development and API can be found on the Developer Portal.
If you are more into listening and watching: check this recent webinar explaining Zilliqa and Scilla. Link is time-stamped so you’ll start right away with a platform introduction, roadmap 2020 and afterwards a proper Scilla introduction.
 
Generalized: programming languages can be divided into being ‘object-oriented’ or ‘functional’. Here is an ELI5 given by software development academy: * “all programs have two basic components, data – what the program knows – and behavior – what the program can do with that data. So object-oriented programming states that combining data and related behaviors in one place, is called “object”, which makes it easier to understand how a particular program works. On the other hand, functional programming argues that data and behavior are different things and should be separated to ensure their clarity.” *
 
Scilla is on the functional side and shares similarities with OCaml: OCaml is a general-purpose programming language with an emphasis on expressiveness and safety. It has an advanced type system that helps catch your mistakes without getting in your way. It's used in environments where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters, is supported by an active community, and has a rich set of libraries and development tools. For all its power, OCaml is also pretty simple, which is one reason it's often used as a teaching language.
 
Scilla is blockchain agnostic, can be implemented onto other blockchains as well, is recognized by academics and won a so-called Distinguished Artifact Award award at the end of last year.
 
One of the reasons why the Zilliqa team decided to create their own programming language focused on preventing smart contract vulnerabilities is that adding logic on a blockchain, programming, means that you cannot afford to make mistakes. Otherwise, it could cost you. It’s all great and fun blockchains being immutable but updating your code because you found a bug isn’t the same as with a regular web application for example. And with smart contracts, it inherently involves cryptocurrencies in some form thus value.
 
Another difference with programming languages on a blockchain is gas. Every transaction you do on a smart contract platform like Zilliqa or Ethereum costs gas. With gas you basically pay for computational costs. Sending a ZIL from address A to address B costs 0.001 ZIL currently. Smart contracts are more complex, often involve various functions and require more gas (if gas is a new concept click here ).
 
So with Scilla, similar to Solidity, you need to make sure that “every function in your smart contract will run as expected without hitting gas limits. An improper resource analysis may lead to situations where funds may get stuck simply because a part of the smart contract code cannot be executed due to gas limits. Such constraints are not present in traditional software systems”. Scilla design story part 1
 
Some examples of smart contract issues you’d want to avoid are: leaking funds, ‘unexpected changes to critical state variables’ (example: someone other than you setting his or her address as the owner of the smart contract after creation) or simply killing a contract.
 
Scilla also allows for formal verification. Wikipedia to the rescue: In the context of hardware and software systems, formal verification is the act of proving or disproving the correctness of intended algorithms underlying a system with respect to a certain formal specification or property, using formal methods of mathematics.
 
Formal verification can be helpful in proving the correctness of systems such as: cryptographic protocols, combinational circuits, digital circuits with internal memory, and software expressed as source code.
 
Scilla is being developed hand-in-hand with formalization of its semantics and its embedding into the Coq proof assistant — a state-of-the art tool for mechanized proofs about properties of programs.”
 
Simply put, with Scilla and accompanying tooling developers can be mathematically sure and proof that the smart contract they’ve written does what he or she intends it to do.
 
Smart contract on a sharded environment and state sharding
 
There is one more topic I’d like to touch on: smart contract execution in a sharded environment (and what is the effect of state sharding). This is a complex topic. I’m not able to explain it any easier than what is posted here. But I will try to compress the post into something easy to digest.
 
Earlier on we have established that Zilliqa can process transactions in parallel due to network sharding. This is where the linear scalability comes from. We can define simple transactions: a transaction from address A to B (Category 1), a transaction where a user interacts with one smart contract (Category 2) and the most complex ones where triggering a transaction results in multiple smart contracts being involved (Category 3). The shards are able to process transactions on their own without interference of the other shards. With Category 1 transactions that is doable, with Category 2 transactions sometimes if that address is in the same shard as the smart contract but with Category 3 you definitely need communication between the shards. Solving that requires to make a set of communication rules the protocol needs to follow in order to process all transactions in a generalised fashion.
 
And this is where the downsides of state sharding comes in currently. All shards in Zilliqa have access to the complete state. Yes the state size (0.1 GB at the moment) grows and all of the nodes need to store it but it also means that they don’t need to shop around for information available on other shards. Requiring more communication and adding more complexity. Computer science knowledge and/or developer knowledge required links if you want to dig further: Scilla - language grammar Scilla - Foundations for Verifiable Decentralised Computations on a Blockchain Gas Accounting NUS x Zilliqa: Smart contract language workshop
 
Easier to follow links on programming Scilla https://learnscilla.com/home Ivan on Tech
 
Roadmap / Zilliqa 2.0
 
There is no strict defined roadmap but here are topics being worked on. And via the Zilliqa website there is also more information on the projects they are working on.
 
Business & Partnerships
 
It’s not only technology in which Zilliqa seems to be excelling as their ecosystem has been expanding and starting to grow rapidly. The project is on a mission to provide OpenFinance (OpFi) to the world and Singapore is the right place to be due to its progressive regulations and futuristic thinking. Singapore has taken a proactive approach towards cryptocurrencies by introducing the Payment Services Act 2019 (PS Act). Among other things, the PS Act will regulate intermediaries dealing with certain cryptocurrencies, with a particular focus on consumer protection and anti-money laundering. It will also provide a stable regulatory licensing and operating framework for cryptocurrency entities, effectively covering all crypto businesses and exchanges based in Singapore. According to PWC 82% of the surveyed executives in Singapore reported blockchain initiatives underway and 13% of them have already brought the initiatives live to the market. There is also an increasing list of organizations that are starting to provide digital payment services. Moreover, Singaporean blockchain developers Building Cities Beyond has recently created an innovation $15 million grant to encourage development on its ecosystem. This all suggests that Singapore tries to position itself as (one of) the leading blockchain hubs in the world.
 
Zilliqa seems to already take advantage of this and recently helped launch Hg Exchange on their platform, together with financial institutions PhillipCapital, PrimePartners and Fundnel. Hg Exchange, which is now approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), uses smart contracts to represent digital assets. Through Hg Exchange financial institutions worldwide can use Zilliqa's safe-by-design smart contracts to enable the trading of private equities. For example, think of companies such as Grab, Airbnb, SpaceX that are not available for public trading right now. Hg Exchange will allow investors to buy shares of private companies & unicorns and capture their value before an IPO. Anquan, the main company behind Zilliqa, has also recently announced that they became a partner and shareholder in TEN31 Bank, which is a fully regulated bank allowing for tokenization of assets and is aiming to bridge the gap between conventional banking and the blockchain world. If STOs, the tokenization of assets, and equity trading will continue to increase, then Zilliqa’s public blockchain would be the ideal candidate due to its strategic positioning, partnerships, regulatory compliance and the technology that is being built on top of it.
 
What is also very encouraging is their focus on banking the un(der)banked. They are launching a stablecoin basket starting with XSGD. As many of you know, stablecoins are currently mostly used for trading. However, Zilliqa is actively trying to broaden the use case of stablecoins. I recommend everybody to read this text that Amrit Kumar wrote (one of the co-founders). These stablecoins will be integrated in the traditional markets and bridge the gap between the crypto world and the traditional world. This could potentially revolutionize and legitimise the crypto space if retailers and companies will for example start to use stablecoins for payments or remittances, instead of it solely being used for trading.
 
Zilliqa also released their DeFi strategic roadmap (dating November 2019) which seems to be aligning well with their OpFi strategy. A non-custodial DEX is coming to Zilliqa made by Switcheo which allows cross-chain trading (atomic swaps) between ETH, EOS and ZIL based tokens. They also signed a Memorandum of Understanding for a (soon to be announced) USD stablecoin. And as Zilliqa is all about regulations and being compliant, I’m speculating on it to be a regulated USD stablecoin. Furthermore, XSGD is already created and visible on block explorer and XIDR (Indonesian Stablecoin) is also coming soon via StraitsX. Here also an overview of the Tech Stack for Financial Applications from September 2019. Further quoting Amrit Kumar on this:
 
There are two basic building blocks in DeFi/OpFi though: 1) stablecoins as you need a non-volatile currency to get access to this market and 2) a dex to be able to trade all these financial assets. The rest are built on top of these blocks.
 
So far, together with our partners and community, we have worked on developing these building blocks with XSGD as a stablecoin. We are working on bringing a USD-backed stablecoin as well. We will soon have a decentralised exchange developed by Switcheo. And with HGX going live, we are also venturing into the tokenization space. More to come in the future.”
 
Additionally, they also have this ZILHive initiative that injects capital into projects. There have been already 6 waves of various teams working on infrastructure, innovation and research, and they are not from ASEAN or Singapore only but global: see Grantees breakdown by country. Over 60 project teams from over 20 countries have contributed to Zilliqa's ecosystem. This includes individuals and teams developing wallets, explorers, developer toolkits, smart contract testing frameworks, dapps, etc. As some of you may know, Unstoppable Domains (UD) blew up when they launched on Zilliqa. UD aims to replace cryptocurrency addresses with a human-readable name and allows for uncensorable websites. Zilliqa will probably be the only one able to handle all these transactions onchain due to ability to scale and its resulting low fees which is why the UD team launched this on Zilliqa in the first place. Furthermore, Zilliqa also has a strong emphasis on security, compliance, and privacy, which is why they partnered with companies like Elliptic, ChainSecurity (part of PwC Switzerland), and Incognito. Their sister company Aqilliz (Zilliqa spelled backwards) focuses on revolutionizing the digital advertising space and is doing interesting things like using Zilliqa to track outdoor digital ads with companies like Foodpanda.
 
Zilliqa is listed on nearly all major exchanges, having several different fiat-gateways and recently have been added to Binance’s margin trading and futures trading with really good volume. They also have a very impressive team with good credentials and experience. They don't just have “tech people”. They have a mix of tech people, business people, marketeers, scientists, and more. Naturally, it's good to have a mix of people with different skill sets if you work in the crypto space.
 
Marketing & Community
 
Zilliqa has a very strong community. If you just follow their Twitter their engagement is much higher for a coin that has approximately 80k followers. They also have been ‘coin of the day’ by LunarCrush many times. LunarCrush tracks real-time cryptocurrency value and social data. According to their data, it seems Zilliqa has a more fundamental and deeper understanding of marketing and community engagement than almost all other coins. While almost all coins have been a bit frozen in the last months, Zilliqa seems to be on its own bull run. It was somewhere in the 100s a few months ago and is currently ranked #46 on CoinGecko. Their official Telegram also has over 20k people and is very active, and their community channel which is over 7k now is more active and larger than many other official channels. Their local communities also seem to be growing.
 
Moreover, their community started ‘Zillacracy’ together with the Zilliqa core team ( see www.zillacracy.com ). It’s a community-run initiative where people from all over the world are now helping with marketing and development on Zilliqa. Since its launch in February 2020 they have been doing a lot and will also run their own non-custodial seed node for staking. This seed node will also allow them to start generating revenue for them to become a self sustaining entity that could potentially scale up to become a decentralized company working in parallel with the Zilliqa core team. Comparing it to all the other smart contract platforms (e.g. Cardano, EOS, Tezos etc.) they don't seem to have started a similar initiative (correct me if I’m wrong though). This suggests in my opinion that these other smart contract platforms do not fully understand how to utilize the ‘power of the community’. This is something you cannot ‘buy with money’ and gives many projects in the space a disadvantage.
 
Zilliqa also released two social products called SocialPay and Zeeves. SocialPay allows users to earn ZILs while tweeting with a specific hashtag. They have recently used it in partnership with the Singapore Red Cross for a marketing campaign after their initial pilot program. It seems like a very valuable social product with a good use case. I can see a lot of traditional companies entering the space through this product, which they seem to suggest will happen. Tokenizing hashtags with smart contracts to get network effect is a very smart and innovative idea.
 
Regarding Zeeves, this is a tipping bot for Telegram. They already have 1000s of signups and they plan to keep upgrading it for more and more people to use it (e.g. they recently have added a quiz features). They also use it during AMAs to reward people in real-time. It’s a very smart approach to grow their communities and get familiar with ZIL. I can see this becoming very big on Telegram. This tool suggests, again, that the Zilliqa team has a deeper understanding of what the crypto space and community needs and is good at finding the right innovative tools to grow and scale.
 
To be honest, I haven’t covered everything (i’m also reaching the character limited haha). So many updates happening lately that it's hard to keep up, such as the International Monetary Fund mentioning Zilliqa in their report, custodial and non-custodial Staking, Binance Margin, Futures, Widget, entering the Indian market, and more. The Head of Marketing Colin Miles has also released this as an overview of what is coming next. And last but not least, Vitalik Buterin has been mentioning Zilliqa lately acknowledging Zilliqa and mentioning that both projects have a lot of room to grow. There is much more info of course and a good part of it has been served to you on a silver platter. I invite you to continue researching by yourself :-) And if you have any comments or questions please post here!
submitted by haveyouheardaboutit to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Bitcoin BTC/USD - YouTube bitcoin Mining Software 🏻 Bitcoin Price Usd Must See ... Bitcoin Price Analysis - 18 July 2020 Why Does Bitcoin Have Value ? Historical Price of Bitcoin (2010 - 2019)

0.01 Bitcoin = 96.599600 US Dollar: 0.1 Bitcoin = 965.996000 US Dollar: 1 Bitcoin = 9659.960 US Dollar: 2 Bitcoin = 19319.92 US Dollar: 3 Bitcoin = 28979.88 US Dollar: 5 Bitcoin = 48299.80 US Dollar: 10 Bitcoin = 96599.60 US Dollar: 20 Bitcoin = 193199 US Dollar: 50 Bitcoin = 482998 US Dollar: 100 Bitcoin = 965996 US Dollar: 1000 Bitcoin Bitcoin USD price, real-time charts, bitcoin news and videos. Learn about BTC, crypto trading and more. Market Wrap: Bitcoin Hits 1-Month High; DeFi Value Locked Hits $3.3B. Daniel Cawrey Jul The world’s first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin is stored and exchanged securely on the internet through a digital ledger known as a blockchain. Bitcoins are divisible into smaller units known as satoshis — each satoshi is worth 0.00000001 bitcoin. Bitcoin Satoshi => USD. You can now select between which ticker to use above- Coindesk or BitcoinAverage Satoshi = USD $ 0 *Click the Satoshi value or USD value to change it* $ USD = x Satoshi = x BTC. BTC ฿1 = $ x USD. Refresh ↻ - occurs every 100 seconds Bitcoin to Dollar; Bitcoin in US Dollars Dollar value; 0.00010347 BTC = 1 USD: 0.00020695 BTC = 2 USD: 0.00051736 BTC = 5 USD: 0.00103473 BTC = 10 USD: 0.01034728 BTC =

[index] [31046] [23115] [18911] [23799] [12329] [15896] [27591] [13605] [1771] [19671]

Bitcoin BTC/USD - YouTube

-bitcoin price usd -best bitcoin price in united states 2020 -best bitcoin price prediction 2020 One thing I discovered when I was researching details on bitcoin price prediction was the absence ... This video shows the historical chart of Bitcoin/USD starting year 2010 to 2019. Source: https://info.binance.com/en/currencies/bitcoin Please subscribe for ... Buy or sell bitcoin with the best crypto exchange, get your account here: https://bit.ly/3gSalKr Bitcoin price predictions: 1 target $19.000 +80%, 2 target $35.000 +230%, in the next 1.500 days ... Is a $1 Million Bitcoin Possible? Let's make the case. ... Will Bitcoin Reach 1 Million Dollars? Yes Here is Why! ... Bitcoin Halving Explained & BTC Price Prediction 2021 - Duration: ... -bitcoin price usd -best bitcoin price in united states 2020 -best bitcoin price prediction 2020 One thing I noticed when I was researching information on bitcoin mining software was the lack of ...

Flag Counter